Skip to content

Fix #1316: use table to define process #1618

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
May 17, 2018

Conversation

rtoy
Copy link
Member

@rtoy rtoy commented May 15, 2018

@rtoy rtoy changed the title Fix #1316: use table to define process WIP: Fix #1316: use table to define process May 15, 2018
@rtoy rtoy changed the title WIP: Fix #1316: use table to define process Fix #1316: use table to define process May 16, 2018
@rtoy rtoy requested review from hoch and mdjp May 16, 2018 22:20
@rtoy
Copy link
Member Author

rtoy commented May 16, 2018

PTAL at this general approach. Might be best to look at the preview (not diff), section 1.33.4.3. This introduces two new bikeshed warnings but I think it makes it much easier to read and understand because it matches how other methods are described. Can't define this method in IDL, so these warnings will just have to live.

The alternative is to do this by hand using html. Prefer not to do that so that we remain consistent with what bikeshed does.

The section on defining a valid processor is pretty short now. Not exactly sure what to do here.

@hoch
Copy link
Member

hoch commented May 16, 2018

Actually this looks good! I was wondering about how Bikeshed will handle this IDL mismatch, but I can live with a warning.

LGTM.

rtoy added 2 commits May 16, 2018 16:03
State what the types are for the `inputs` and `outputs` parameters to
`process()`.

Remove the section about defining a valid processor because this no
longer adds anything more that isn't already covered by the existing
examples..
@rtoy rtoy merged commit 320d3d5 into WebAudio:gh-pages May 17, 2018
rtoy added a commit to rtoy/web-audio-api that referenced this pull request May 17, 2018
rtoy added a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants